{"id":48578,"date":"2019-07-15T02:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-07-15T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/shop.budrich-academic.de\/produkt\/europeanisation-and-renationalisation\/"},"modified":"2022-09-10T00:00:19","modified_gmt":"2022-09-09T22:00:19","slug":"europeanisation-and-renationalisation","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/shop.budrich.de\/en\/produkt\/europeanisation-and-renationalisation\/","title":{"rendered":"Europeanisation and Renationalisation"},"content":{"rendered":"

The book explores how the European Union and its members have been renegotiating Europeanisation and renationalisation in response to the multiple crises they faced in recent years. The authors highlight varying understandings of \u00b4crises\u00b4 in different national and supranational policy and institutional contexts. They show how in some cases these have challenged the legitimacy of European Union norms and institutions and even triggered disintegration, while in other cases these crises have served as sources of inspiration for European social innovation and political development.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Over recent years, European societies have been experiencing a series of crises that have threatened the effectiveness and legitimacy of the European Union. The results have been contradictory across different fields, some of them indicating renationalisation and disintegration, others pointing towards more europeanisation and integration:<\/p>\n

Most prominently, the \u2018refugee crisis\u2019 has been met with conflicting domestic responses which have led the European Common Asylum System and Schengen into stalemate. The EU\u2019s conflicts with Russia and Turkey have undermined the EU\u2019s tool box of Eastern Partnership, neighbourhood policy and enlargement. The UK\u2019s \u201cBrexit\u201d referendum of June 2016 is the most conspicuous case in point signaling renationalization rather than the strengthening of Europeanization in response to such crises. By contrast, the financial and sovereign debt crisis since 2008 has been conducive for the European Economic and Monetary Union to adopt new instruments for deepening and broadening the politics of Europeanization. Similar developments are visible in other policy fields such as energy and external climate protection.<\/p>\n

The book draws these contradictory trends together to discuss the lessons that have \u2013 and that have not \u2013 been learnt by political, economic and civil society actors in their struggles about European social innovation and political development.<\/p>\n

Inhaltsverzeichnis<\/a><\/p>\n

Table of Contents (pdf):<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n